Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000357›Full record

ArticleEcological processes2025

Ecosystem engineering of tundra heath by Arctic fox (

Liam Baron-Preston, James D Roth, John H Markham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological processes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liam Baron-PrestonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada.
James D RothDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada.
John H MarkhamDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1060-496X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Soil nutrient availability is a limiting factor for tundra productivity. Therefore, consumer-driven alteration of nutrient availability can have a large effect on tundra communities. Previous work has demonstrated that Arctic foxes ( Results: Changes in experimental plots were mainly driven by fertilizer application, not snow depth. After 2 years, the fertilizer plots were invaded by a dune grass ( Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the nutrient limitation in tundra vegetation makes tundra ecosystems vulnerable to changes in nutrient availability, with changes in plant abundance and composition leading to increased animal activity, that has the potential to create a positive feedback in ecosystem productivity. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13717-025-00646-5.

Indexed as

Arctic foxEcosystem engineerNutrient limitationTundra heath

Identifiers

PMID41000357
PMCPMC12457229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.