ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Support vector machine-based classification of bulimia nervosa using diffusion tensor imaging.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alterations in brain structure have been suggested to be associated with bulimia nervosa (BN). This study aimed to employ machine learning (ML) methods based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to facilitate the diagnosis of BN and to identify potential neurobiological markers. Methods: Thirty-four drug-naive females with bulimia nervosa (BN) and 34 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs) underwent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) scanning. The extracted features included fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), and mean diffusivity (MD). Support vector machines (SVM), a commonly used machine learning (ML) approach, were employed to distinguish individuals with BN from healthy controls. Results: Five ML models were constructed. The FA model (AUC=0.821) and the combined FA+MD+AD+RD model (AUC=0.739) exhibited satisfactory classification performance, with the FA model exhibiting the most effective results. The FA model achieved an accuracy of 82.35%, a specificity of 82.35%, and a sensitivity of 85.29%. The contributing brain regions were primarily located in the frontal lobe, brainstem, temporal lobe, midbrain, cerebellar tonsil, and posterior cerebellar lobe. In contrast, the MD model (AUC=0.689), the AD model (AUC=0.621), and the RD model (AUC=0.625) demonstrated poor classification performance. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that DTI-based machine learning (ML) approaches could effectively differentiate individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN) from healthy controls (HCs), thereby providing insights into potential neurobiological markers associated with BN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.