Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000329›Full record

ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports

Neurofilament light (NfL) chain levels predict clinical decline in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kim Thomas, Paul Spin, Nikita Sir, Kevin Hou, Nicholas J Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Sonya Miller, Carol Pringle, Richard Stefanacci, Claude M Wischik and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kim ThomasValue & Evidence, EVERSANA™, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Paul SpinValue & Evidence, EVERSANA™, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Nikita SirValue & Evidence, EVERSANA™, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin HouValue & Evidence, EVERSANA™, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Nicholas J AshtonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Sonya MillerTauRx Therapeutics Ltd, Aberdeen, UK.
Carol PringleTauRx Therapeutics Ltd, Aberdeen, UK.
Richard StefanacciTauRx Therapeutics Ltd, Aberdeen, UK.
Claude M WischikTauRx Therapeutics Ltd, Aberdeen, UK.
Serge GauthierDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Regulatory approval of new investigational Alzheimer's disease (AD) therapies could be accelerated if reasonably likely surrogate endpoints could be used. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) has potential utility as a prognostic biomarker of neurodegeneration in AD. Objective: To synthesize available evidence on the relationship between baseline NfL levels and longitudinal clinical decline. Methods: A systematic literature review identified 19 eligible studies, contributing 37 longitudinal statistical models evaluating the association between baseline NfL (plasma or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) with subsequent clinical decline based on validated clinical scales including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale, and Clinical Dementia Rating. Results were pooled via meta-analysis, using partial correlation coefficients (PCC), separately for patient sub-groups (mild cognitive impairment, AD or combined). Results: Across the AD continuum, higher baseline NfL levels were consistently associated with greater cognitive and global clinical decline in most analyses. This pattern was consistent for both plasma (pooled PCC = -0.17 [95% CI = -0.22, -0.12] for MMSE, any AD population) and CSF NfL (pooled PCC = -0.14 [95% CI = -0.24, -0.04] for MMSE, any AD population). The strength of association across multiple clinical endpoints and populations, measured by absolute value of pooled PCC, ranged from 0.13 to 0.25. Conclusions: The results support the utility of NfL as a predictive biomarker for progression of clinical decline in AD patients.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasecognitive declinemeta-analysisneurofilament Lneurofilament protein lightplasma biomarkersurrogate endpointsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41000329
PMCPMC12457754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.