ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025
Statistical cure fraction in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical resection: a secondary analysis of reconstructed individual patient data.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been applied in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC), limited data on long-term outcomes are available to support its role as a potentially curable therapeutic option. This study assessed the probability of being statistically cured among these patients. Methods: The literature search was conducted focusing on previous studies that investigated the long-term recurrence-free survival rates of patients with BR-PDAC after NAT followed by radical resection. The reference cohort data were extracted from studies including patients undergoing upfront radical resection for resectable PDAC. Pseudo-individual patient data were reconstructed from the original papers. A non-mixture cure model was adopted to estimate the statistical cure fraction. Results: Twelve retrospective studies reporting long-term recurrence-free survival after NAT followed by radical resection for patients with BR-PDAC were secondarily analyzed. The probability of being statistically cured in these patients was 8.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4%-11.5%), which was lower than that of the reference cohort of 5 retrospective studies (14.7%; 95% CI, 13.2%-16.4%). There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (hazard ratio, 1.110; 95% CI, 1.007-1.224). Conclusion: From this study, we concluded that a cure can be expected in around eight percent of patients with BR-PDAC after NAT followed by radical resection, which would be helpful in counseling patients, as well as deciding whether to perform the surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.