ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025
Radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic, non-functioning thyroid nodules: a single-center retrospective observational study.
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating thyroid nodules (TNs). Methods: We retrospectively included the patients who underwent RFA for TNs in our hospital between January 2020 and December 2023. Preoperative and postoperative data including age, sex, body mass index, and thyroid hormone levels were collected from each patient. The efficacy of RFA on TNs was analyzed by evaluating the volume reduction (VR) and volume reduction rate (VRR) at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12, respectively. In addition, the efficacy of RFA on nodule composition and postoperative complications was evaluated. Finally, a subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential risks. Results: VR at postoperative month 12 was significantly higher than those at postoperative months 1, 3, and 6, respectively (all P < 0.001). VRR at month 12 was significantly higher than that of months 1, 3, and 6, respectively (all P < 0.001). Conclusion: RFA is an effective option for treating TNs with good safety. VR and VRR showed significant increase after RFA compared with the pretreatment levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.