ArticleFood technology and biotechnology
Gluten Contamination of Rice: Analytical Testing
Article in Food technology and biotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research background: Gluten contamination is the main concern of those who follow a gluten-free diet. Although rice is naturally gluten-free, previous studies have identified gluten contamination of rice that can occur during processing, storage, handling or cooking. As a result, consumer confidence may be affected, emphasising the need to examine how these concerns shape their risk perceptions and influence their subsequent decisions. This study aims to evaluate: ( Experimental approach: This cross-sectional study combined survey methods and laboratory analysis. An online questionnaire was used to assess the perceived risk of gluten contamination in rice among individuals following a gluten-free diet ( Results and conclusions: Laboratory assays failed to detect gluten in any of the rice samples (limit of quantification 5 mg/kg), yet 54 (82 %) respondents expressed high uncertainty about the risk of gluten contamination in rice. These results show a significant discrepancy between consumer perception and scientific evidence. They emphasise the need for improved communication and clearer labelling to build consumer trust and support informed dietary choices. Novelty and scientific contribution: This study highlights the gap between the perceived and actual risk of gluten contamination in naturally gluten-free food and emphasises the importance of addressing consumer concerns through better education and transparent product information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.