Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000213›Full record

ReviewFood technology and biotechnology

Sustainability and Influencing Factors in Bacterial Cellulose Production: A Review of the Impact of Microorganisms, Culture Media and Cultivation Methods.

Rebeca Priscila Flora Catarino, Vinicius Avanzi Barbosa Mascareli, Viviane Lopes Leite da Costa, Ana Clara Longhi Pavanello, Wilma Aparecida Spinosa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food technology and biotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Bacterial Cellulose Production by a NovelFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebeca Priscila Flora CatarinoState University of Londrina, Celso Garcia Cid Road, Km 380, 86051-970 Londrina, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1539-2150
Vinicius Avanzi Barbosa MascareliState University of Londrina, Celso Garcia Cid Road, Km 380, 86051-970 Londrina, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-8790
Viviane Lopes Leite da CostaState University of Londrina, Celso Garcia Cid Road, Km 380, 86051-970 Londrina, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7274-7475
Ana Clara Longhi PavanelloState University of Londrina, Celso Garcia Cid Road, Km 380, 86051-970 Londrina, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7492-9133
Wilma Aparecida SpinosaState University of Londrina, Celso Garcia Cid Road, Km 380, 86051-970 Londrina, PR, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9532-0135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides a comprehensive analysis of bacterial cellulose production, with a focus on the key factors influencing the bioprocess, including microorganism selection, substrate optimization and cultivation techniques. It addresses the challenges associated with bacterial cellulose production and proposes strategies to optimize upstream processes, such as microorganism preservation, inoculum preparation and culture medium formulation, which are critical for improving production efficiency. Additionally, the review explores the effects of fermentation parameters such as time, temperature, and oxygen availability on the yield and quality of bacterial cellulose. It also highlights the growing interest in utilizing alternative substrates, particularly agro-industrial waste, to reduce production costs and improve sustainability. By evaluating these factors, this review provides valuable insights for the further development of bacterial cellulose production in both research and industrial applications.

Indexed as

agro-industrial wastebacterial cellulose productionbioprocessmicrobial selectionoxidative fermentation parameters

Identifiers

PMID41000213
PMCPMC12413492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.