ReviewJournal of inflammation research2025
Tocilizumab for Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological and Targeted Therapy in Non-Infectious Uveitis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Blood-Ocular Barrier Dysfunction in Uveitis: A Bidirectional Model Linking Pathogenesis, Clinical Monitoring, and Therapeutic Opportunities.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Irreversible Ocular and Systemic Damage in ROSAH Syndrome.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Tocilizumab in FIRES: From Treatment Timing to Treat-to-Target Use [Letter].Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Biosimilars in Adult and Pediatric Noninfectious Uveitis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases causing severe ocular inflammation that threatens vision. In addition to visual impairment, patients frequently endure chronic pain, functional disorders, and psychosocial stress, all of which substantially reduce quality of life. Treating NIU remains challenging because many patients respond inadequately to high-dose corticosteroids and various immunosuppressants. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in NIU treatment by analyzing case reports and small-scale studies. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to May 1, 2025, identified all published cases reporting baseline and follow-up visual acuity alongside intervention details. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) assessed methodological quality, while the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool evaluated risk of bias. The systematic review included 96 patients (36 males, 60 females) with an average age of 35 years (range 4-72). Behçet's disease (BD) represented the most common underlying condition (33 cases), and panuveitis was the primary anatomical subtype (35 cases). Prior to TCZ initiation, patients had received an average of 2.8 conventional immunosuppressants and 1.6 biologics, yet persistent disease activity remained. The median interval from diagnosis to TCZ treatment was 11.8 months (range 4-24). Following TCZ administration, vision improved in 62.5% of patients, intraocular inflammation was controlled in 83.3%, and macular edema resolved in 90.9%. Overall, 83.3% (80/96) responded favorably to TCZ. These findings indicate that TCZ may serve as an effective alternative for managing refractory NIU when other treatments fail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.