ReviewPain reports2025
Digital health solutions for caregivers of children experiencing acute pain: a scoping review.
Review in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital health solutions are often used to support caregivers in managing acute pain in their children. The aim of this scoping review was to identify, characterize, and synthesize the literature on caregiver-targeted digital health solutions for acute pain management in children as it relates to caregiver, child, and implementation outcomes. Studies must have described a caregiver-targeted digital health solution for acute pain management in children that provides information or support to caregivers of children experiencing acute pain (eg, needle-related procedure, injury, medical procedure). Studies that included caregivers of children 0 to 19 years were eligible. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched from January 1, 2010 to May 20, 2025. Two reviewers completed screening and data extraction, and a third reviewer resolved disagreements. From 8949 records screened, 33 studies were eligible. From these, there were 15 individual digital health solutions identified. Of the 7,125 caregivers, 95.2% were mothers. More than half of digital health solutions targeted caregivers of newborns (0-1 years, 60.6%), and all except 2 focused on acute pain during needle-related procedures (eg, vaccinations). Overall, 21 studies reported on caregiver outcomes (primarily knowledge), 11 reported on child outcomes (primarily pain and distress), and 28 reported on implementation outcomes (primarily adoption and acceptability). There is a need for (1) standardization in the evaluation of digital health solutions for caregivers, (2) digital health solutions that target acute pain other than needle-related procedures, and (3) increased diversity of caregivers (eg, non-White, non-mothers) and solutions (eg, culturally diverse).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.