Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000162›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

A Protocol for Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis With Module Preservation and Functional Enrichment Analysis for Tumor and Normal Transcriptomic Data.

Phuong Nguyen, Erliang Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phuong NguyenDivision of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Erliang ZengDivision of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) is widely used in transcriptomic studies to identify groups of highly correlated genes, aiding in the understanding of disease mechanisms. Although numerous protocols exist for constructing WGCNA networks from gene expression data, many focus on single datasets and do not address how to compare module stability across conditions. Here, we present a protocol for constructing and comparing WGCNA modules in paired tumor and normal datasets, enabling the identification of modules involved in both core biological processes and those specifically related to cancer pathogenesis. By incorporating module preservation analysis, this approach allows researchers to gain deeper insights into the molecular underpinnings of oral cancer, as well as other diseases. Overall, this protocol provides a framework for module preservation analysis in paired datasets, enabling researchers to identify which gene co-expression modules are conserved or disrupted between conditions, thereby advancing our understanding of disease-specific vs. universal biological processes. Key features • Presents a step-by-step WGCNA protocol with module preservation and functional enrichment analysis [1,2] using TCGA cancer data, demonstrating network differences between normal and tumor tissues. • Preprocesses gene expression data and conducts downstream analysis for constructed networks. • Requires 2-3 h hands-on time and 8-12 h total computational time, depending on dataset size and permutation number used for module preservation analysis.

Indexed as

Functional enrichment analysisGene expressionModule preservation analysisOral cancerWGCNA

Identifiers

PMID41000162
PMCPMC12457846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.