ArticleO&G open2025
Patients' Perspectives on Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Nongynecologic Surgery.
Article in O&G open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Perceptions and Practices in Primary Care Providers Regarding Opportunistic Salpingectomy.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify barriers and facilitators from patients' perspectives for the implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy during nongynecologic surgeries.
methodsThis was a qualitative study based on individual in-depth interviews with patients (N=21) from six academic and nonacademic Dutch hospitals that have undergone various nongynecologic surgeries. Open and axial coding of semistructured interviews was used to explore barriers and facilitators from patients' perspectives, categorized according to the implementation domains of Grol and Wensing and Flottorp et al: innovation, health care professional, patient, social context, organizational context, and economic and political context.
resultsNineteen of 21 patients (90.5%) would opt for opportunistic salpingectomy during nongynecologic surgery. Barriers and facilitators were found in all domains, with most encompassed in the patient domain. The most relevant barriers were lack of patient awareness regarding the existence and rationale of opportunistic salpingectomy, lack of completion of childbearing, and the overall low ovarian cancer risk. The most important facilitators were the prevention of ovarian cancer and its lethality, patients' confidence in their treating physician, provision of adequate information, and the loss of fallopian tube function after completion of childbearing.
conclusionThis study identified key barriers and facilitators across multiple domains, providing a basis to develop a tailored implementation strategy aimed to implement opportunistic salpingectomy use during nongynecologic surgeries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.