ArticleO&G open2025
Pain With Early Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement.
Article in O&G open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03462758 (Early vs. Interval Postpartum IUD Insertion), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early vs. Interval Postpartum IUD Insertion: A Multi-site Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare pain between early and interval postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) placement.
methodsThis is a planned secondary outcome analysis of a randomized trial among 404 participants randomized to early (14-28 days) or interval (42-56 days) postpartum IUD placement. Participants reported pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale at three times during IUD placement (bimanual examination, speculum placement, and IUD placement). We estimated that 112 participants would be required to achieve 80% power with an α of 5% to detect a 15-mm difference in pain with IUD placement. We used linear mixed models adjusting for demographic differences to compare mean pain scores between groups and per-protocol sensitivity analyses to account for crossover.
resultsWe enrolled 404 participants between March 2018 and July 2021; 325 received IUDs and were included in the analysis of pain with placement. Mean pain scores reported were not different between the early and interval groups: bimanual (9.2 mm vs 6.95 mm, mean difference 2.25 mm [95% CI, -2.68 to7.17],
conclusionPain reported is not different among people who are postpartum having early and interval IUD placement. Understanding the experience of pain with early and interval placement may help clinicians support patients in making informed choices about the timing of IUD placement. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03462758.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.