ArticleO&G open2025
Black Birthing People's Perspectives on Racial Concordance With Obstetricians and Midwives.
Article in O&G open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore Black birthing people's perspectives on racial concordance with obstetricians and midwives and understand how their lived experiences with racism, discrimination, and contextualized stress influence those perspectives.
methodsThis study used a qualitative descriptive approach to conduct 1-on-1 semistructured interviews and focus groups in a sample of individuals who self-identified as Black or African American, were aged 18 years or older, were English-speaking, and gave birth within a large university health system between 2019 and 2021. Potentially eligible individuals were identified using electronic health record data and then were recruited and provided consent electronically. Interview and focus group guides were cocreated by the research team and were used to elicit discussion regarding lifetime experiences with racism and discrimination, experiences with the health care system during pregnancy, and perspectives on racial concordance with obstetricians and midwives. Interviews and focus groups were conducted by experienced researchers who identify as Black women. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed, and data were deidentified for analysis. Thematic analysis was used to group codes into larger themes.
resultsResearchers conducted a total of 16 individual semistructured interviews and five focus groups of two to four participants each. The final sample included 32 individuals who all identified as non-Hispanic Black women. The median age was 32 years, 62.5% were married, and 71.9% had a bachelor's degree or higher. Six themes arose: 1) fear of dying deeply embedded within the Black perinatal experience; 2) obstetricians, midwives, and nurses not listening as an invalidating experience; 3) stereotyping toward Black birthing people; 4) desire for racial concordance with obstetricians, midwives, and nurses as a way of harm reduction; 5) difficulty finding racially concordant obstetricians and midwives as a resigned reality; and 6) self-advocacy and seeking continuity with one obstetrician or midwife as strategies for obtaining quality care.
conclusionBlack birthing people in this study shared a clear preference for racially concordant obstetricians and midwives, specifically citing fear of dying and experiences of racism and discrimination both in their lives generally and in obstetric care as major reasons why, and they lamented how difficult it is to find this. Increasing opportunities for racially concordant obstetric care may be one strategy for achieving equitable obstetric care for Black birthing people.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.