Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000059›Full record

ReviewFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2025

Role of the Chest Wall in Newborn Respiratory Function at Birth.

C Diedericks, K J Crossley, I M Davies, D A Blank, S J E Cramer, M J Wallace, A B Te Pas, M J Kitchen, S B Hooper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Role of the Chest Wall in Newborn Respiratory Function at Birth.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C DiedericksThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2921-872X
K J CrossleyThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1580-1156
I M DaviesThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1505-6791
D A BlankThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6711-5799
S J E CramerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-0594
M J WallaceThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-5120
A B Te PasDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-8797
M J KitchenThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0029-6660
S B HooperThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-4825

Funding

Australian Government Research Training ProgramFederal Government | DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2012443Federal Government | DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 2021055Federal Government | DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP20262322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chest wall significantly impacts respiratory function after birth, but its role in the newborn remains poorly understood as it is structurally and functionally different from adults. In neonates, the chest wall is highly compliant, which allows it to expand to accommodate the incoming air and the lung liquid cleared into the pulmonary interstitium during lung aeration. However, the high neonatal chest wall compliance predisposes it to distortion, which reduces breathing efficiency and necessitates respiratory muscle activation to stabilize it. This increases the work of breathing and, when combined with fewer fatigue-resistant Type I muscle fibers (slow twitch, high oxidative capacity) in the diaphragm muscle, the risk of respiratory fatigue is increased. Nevertheless, as the chest wall is highly compliant in the newborn, recent studies have demonstrated that extra-thoracic pressures can influence chest wall mechanics. Positive extra-thoracic pressures (such as those applied with tight swaddling) limit chest wall expansion, whereas a small constant negative extra-thoracic pressure stabilizes the chest wall and improves oxygenation in neonates. In this review, we aim to summarize the current evidence on chest wall function in fetuses and neonates, particularly during lung liquid clearance, lung aeration, and breathing after birth. Furthermore, we will explore how knowledge from newborn respiratory physiology may inform our understanding of the respiratory consequences of pulmonary oedema in adults, such as occurred during the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

RespirationThoracic WallCOVID-19HumansInfant, NewbornLungRespiratory MechanicsRespiratory Muscleschest wall compliancechest wall mechanicsneonatalrespiratory transition

Identifiers

PMID41000059
PMCPMC12464809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.