ArticleStroke2025
Multicenter Translational Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRICS BASIC).
Article in Stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Ineligible for Recanalization Therapies: A Phase II Trial.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- CHF6467 Exerts Neuroprotective Effects in the Rat Model of Acute Ischemic Stroke.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Translational Barriers and Optimization Strategies for Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Enhance Stroke Cerebroprotection.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBasic science studies have reported remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) as neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke, although clinical evidence remains conflicting. The TRICS BASIC study (Multicenter Translational Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke) investigated the efficacy and safety of RIC in experimental ischemic stroke using a rigorous clinical trial methodology.
methodsMulticenter, multispecies, parallel group, randomized, controlled, preclinical trial of transient femoral artery clipping to induce RIC in female and male rats and mice subjected to transient endovascular occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Animals were randomized to receive RIC, or sham surgery, after reperfusion. The primary end point was a good functional outcome at 48 hours, assessed using a composite functional neuroscore. Secondary end points were infarct volume at 48 hours and safety, assessed using a standardized health report at 24 and 48 hours. Preenrollment harmonization, centralized monitoring, allocation concealment, blinded outcome assessment, and intention-to-treat analysis were applied.
resultsThe trial enrolled 164 rodents (82 mice and 82 rats) of both sexes (53% females), across 7 laboratories. A greater proportion of RIC-treated rodents achieved a favorable functional outcome compared with controls, at 48 hours postischemia (55% versus 36%; odds ratio, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.23-4.4];
conclusionsSurgically induced RIC provided a modest but evident neuroprotective effect in experimental ischemic stroke, underscoring the potential of this strategy as an adjunctive treatment in stroke care. The findings of the TRICS BASIC study highlighted the importance of multicenter preclinical trials in addressing variability and enhancing translational validity. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.preclinicaltrials.eu; Unique identifier: PCTE0000177.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.