ArticleOncology reports2025
[Retracted] Effects and mechanisms of fatty acid metabolism‑mediated glycolysis regulated by betulinic acid‑loaded nanoliposomes in colorectal cancer.
Article in Oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the publication of this paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by a concerned reader that, regarding the western blot experiments shown in Figs. 6E and 7C, a pair of the gel slices were strikingly similar in appearance, suggesting that the same data had been included in these figures to show the results with different proteins. Moreover, two additional gel slices in these figures had apparently been re‑used in a pair of subsequent papers published by the same research group, where the experimental conditions were indicated to be different, and it was noted by the Editorial Office that one of the gel slices may have contained an anomaly in the form of a break in the continuity of the gel. Upon asking the authors to provide the Editorial Office with an explanation of the above issues, they did supply us with revised versions of Figs. 6E and 7C; however, it was subsequently pointed out to the authors that certain of the western blot data in Fig. 6E had apparently reappeared in a further paper by the same authors, in the journal
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.