Trial reportInternational journal of circumpolar health2025
Tolerance of high fibre supplementation among participants in a randomised trial to reduce cancer risk among Alaska Native peoples: Alaska FIRST.
Trial report in International journal of circumpolar health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Describing the epidemiology of colorectal cancer (CRC), Burkitt (1971) emphasised the increased incidence among developed, industrial populations consuming a more refined diet and proposed dietary fibre as the key to the lower CRC incidence noted in underdeveloped countries with less refined diets. Noting the increased incidence of CRC among Alaska Native (AN) peoples and seemingly low presence of fibre in some AN diets, investigators with the University of Pittsburgh and the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium proposed to test whether large amounts of fibre contained in a dietary supplement could lower CRC risk. We describe supplement tolerance as reported by AN participants completing a 4-week supplementation trial, which added 44.5 grams per day (g/d) total fibre (23.7 g/d resistant starch (RS)) to the diet of those assigned to the intervention arm and 1 g/d total fibre to those assigned to the control arm. Tolerance of the high fibre supplement would play a key role in protocol adherence as well as any recommendations for future use by the broader population. In this study, the daily RS intervention containing 44.5 g/d additional dietary fibre produced more flatulence than usual but fewer other symptoms were consistently reported compared to the digestible starch (DS) control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.