Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999904›Full record

ArticleActa biochimica et biophysica Sinica2025

Rapid detection of

Minwei Li, Zhiyun Hao, Jing Yan, Ximeng Chen, Hangyi Li, Chengbin Wang, Chi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Minwei LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Zhiyun HaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Jing YanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK.
Ximeng ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Hangyi LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Chengbin WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Chi WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid identification of pathogens responsible for bloodstream infection is critical for early intervention and effective treatment. Reporter phages, which are known for their exceptional sensitivity and specificity in pathogen detection, have garnered significant interest. In this study, we systematically evaluate phage genome editing strategies that combine homologous recombination with the CRISPR-Cas9 system. We investigate the impacts of homologous arm length, sgRNA activity, target site, and plasmid interactions on editing efficiency. Our results demonstrate that successful genome editing depends on both sufficient cleavage pressure and optimal homologous arm length, particularly when using low-activity sgRNAs. On the basis of these findings, we develop a highly efficient gene editing strategy TPMSR (triple-plasmid-mediated synchronous recombination) that overcomes the limitations of conventional methods that rely on high-activity sgRNA and restricted editing sites. Using the TPMSR strategy, we integrate the

Indexed as

bloodstream infectionCRISPR-Cas9homologous recombinationreporter phage.

Identifiers

PMID40999904
PMCPMC13107020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.