ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
A Generative Framework for Predicting Antiferromagnets.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Generative Framework for Predicting Antiferromagnets.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting antiferromagnets (AFMs) is crucial for advancing ultrafast spintronics. However, traditional methods are constrained by the complexity of correlated electrons and magnetic ordering, limiting systematic exploration of new chemical spaces. Herein, an AFM design framework integrating a crystal diffusion variational autoencoder is presented with data augmentation (CDVAE-DA), crystal graph convolutional neural networks (CGCNNs), a genetic algorithm (GA), and density functional theory (DFT) validation. CDVAE-DA generates chemically diverse and structurally valid candidates, achieving a composition validity rate of 90.68%. Leveraging transfer learning on an AFM dataset, the CDVAE-DA is biased toward generating AFM structures. The CGCNNs efficiently screen for potential AFMs using three properties: formation energy (FE), total magnetic moment (TMM), and band gap (BG). The GA regulates the direction of structure generation using these properties, while DFT calculations rigorously validate the lattice stability and AFM order of generated structures. Employing this framework with GA yields three AFM semiconductors (MnS, FeO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.