ArticlemAbs2025
A novel throughput assay to assess molecular hydrophobicity during early biotherapeutic developability assessments.
Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developability studies provide essential data to identify monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with optimal drug-like properties, which are indicative of a molecule's suitability for large-scale manufacturing, long-term storage, and ease of administration. Hydrophobicity is a critical molecular attribute that affects solubility, aggregation, and stability at high protein concentrations and is routinely assessed in these studies. Although traditional analytical hydrophobic interaction chromatography (aHIC) is considered the benchmark for measuring hydrophobicity, its application in early developability studies is limited because the process requires serial sample injections, which is time-intensive and impractical for the evaluation of hundreds of molecules. To overcome this limitation, we developed an alternative aHIC method that uses a plate-based assay format, enabling rapid screening of large sample sets. Compatible with automation platforms, this surrogate aHIC method demonstrates excellent accuracy in distinguishing between low- and high-risk molecules, proving to be an efficient tool for preliminary developability assessments. This innovative assay provides a robust, timesaving, and sample-efficient means of evaluating hydrophobicity that readily supports early phase biotherapeutic antibody discovery through selection of mAbs with favorable drug-like properties. Furthermore, the potential for adaptation of this method to various molecular formats suggests its broad applicability in biotherapeutic discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.