Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999852›Full record

ArticlemAbs2025

A novel throughput assay to assess molecular hydrophobicity during early biotherapeutic developability assessments.

Maureen Crames, Mya Davis, Michael S Marlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maureen CramesBiotherapeutics Discovery, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutical Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2879-9726
Mya DavisBiotherapeutics Discovery, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutical Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.
Michael S MarlowBiotherapeutics Discovery, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutical Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9335-7652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developability studies provide essential data to identify monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with optimal drug-like properties, which are indicative of a molecule's suitability for large-scale manufacturing, long-term storage, and ease of administration. Hydrophobicity is a critical molecular attribute that affects solubility, aggregation, and stability at high protein concentrations and is routinely assessed in these studies. Although traditional analytical hydrophobic interaction chromatography (aHIC) is considered the benchmark for measuring hydrophobicity, its application in early developability studies is limited because the process requires serial sample injections, which is time-intensive and impractical for the evaluation of hundreds of molecules. To overcome this limitation, we developed an alternative aHIC method that uses a plate-based assay format, enabling rapid screening of large sample sets. Compatible with automation platforms, this surrogate aHIC method demonstrates excellent accuracy in distinguishing between low- and high-risk molecules, proving to be an efficient tool for preliminary developability assessments. This innovative assay provides a robust, timesaving, and sample-efficient means of evaluating hydrophobicity that readily supports early phase biotherapeutic antibody discovery through selection of mAbs with favorable drug-like properties. Furthermore, the potential for adaptation of this method to various molecular formats suggests its broad applicability in biotherapeutic discovery.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsAntibodies, MonoclonalAutomation platformsbiotherapeuticsdevelopabilityhigh-throughput surrogate assayhydrophobicitymonoclonal antibodies

Identifiers

PMID40999852
PMCPMC12477860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.