ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2026
Enhancing Spinal Cord and Canal Segmentation in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy : The Role of Interactive Learning Models with manual Click.
Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Indocyanine Green Videoangiography in Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: Focus on Lesion Localization Accuracy.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aim to develop an interactive segmentation model that can offer accuracy and reliability for the segmentation of the irregularly shaped spinal cord and canal in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) through manual click and model refinement.
methodsA dataset of 1444 frames from 294 magnetic resonance imaging records of DCM patients was used and we developed two different segmentation models for comparison : auto-segmentation and interactive segmentation. The former was based on U-Net and utilized a pretrained ConvNeXT-tiny as its encoder. For the latter, we employed an interactive segmentation model structured by SimpleClick, a large model that utilizes a vision transformer as its backbone, together with simple fine-tuning. The segmentation performance of the two models were compared in terms of their Dice scores, mean intersection over union (mIoU), Average Precision and Hausdorff distance. The efficiency of the interactive segmentation model was evaluated by the number of clicks required to achieve a target mIoU.
resultsOur model achieved better scores across all four-evaluation metrics for segmentation accuracy, showing improvements of +6.4%, +1.8%, +3.7%, and -53.0% for canal segmentation, and +11.7%, +6.0%, +18.2%, and -70.9% for cord segmentation with 15 clicks, respectively. The required clicks for the interactive segmentation model to achieve a 90% mIoU for spinal canal with cord cases and 80% mIoU for spinal cord cases were 11.71 and 11.99, respectively.
conclusionWe found that the interactive segmentation model significantly outperformed the auto-segmentation model. By incorporating simple manual inputs, the interactive model effectively identified regions of interest, particularly in the complex and irregular shapes of the spinal cord, demonstrating both enhanced accuracy and adaptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.