SynthesisJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025
Impact of Newborn Screening on Survival and Developmental Outcome in Classic Isovaleric Aciduria: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Newborn Screening on Survival and Developmental Outcome in Classic Isovaleric Aciduria: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Classic isovaleric aciduria (cIVA) is a rare inherited metabolic disorder characterized by recurrent life-threatening metabolic decompensations and neurocognitive impairment in untreated patients. This meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of early diagnosis by newborn screening (NBS) on mortality and neurocognitive outcome. A systematic literature search for articles published until 2022 was conducted following PRISMA protocol guidelines. We investigated effects on clinical outcomes and survival, analyzing outcome parameters using meta-analytical measures and estimating effect sizes with a random-effects model. Overall, 20 studies were included, reporting on 240 individuals with cIVA. Individuals identified by NBS presented with a lower frequency of neurological symptoms (13.0% vs. 44.9%; p = 0.0040) and developmental delay (6.1% vs. 51.2%; p < 0.0001), and had a lower mortality rate (1.1% vs. 10.9%; p = 0.0320). The quality of healthcare systems did not have a measurable impact on neurocognitive outcome and mortality. Despite the beneficial effect of NBS on clinical outcome and mortality, it could not reliably prevent the manifestation of neonatal decompensation in all individuals with cIVA identified by NBS. Early diagnosis through NBS is essential for the timely initiation of therapy and for improving outcomes and survival rates in individuals with cIVA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.