ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Task Relevance Modulates Somatosensory Awareness Depending on Stimulus Intensity.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An HD-EEG Database to dissect Somatosensory Awareness from Task Relevance and Report.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Task Relevance Modulates Somatosensory Awareness Depending on Stimulus Intensity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) have proposed that the P3b component reflects higher order postperceptual processes, such as stimulus reporting and task relevance, whereas somatosensory awareness negativity (SAN) is more directly associated with somatosensory awareness. Despite growing evidence supporting this functional distinction, the omission of no-report conditions and controls for task demands hindered a clear separation between report- and task-related processes from those linked with somatosensory awareness. Here, we designed a simple experimental procedure that varied stimulus amplitude (set at individual sensory or motor thresholds) and task relevance (no-report stimulation, report + task-relevant stimuli, report + task-irrelevant stimuli) with two main objectives: first, to verify that P3b appears only when a report is required, being abolished in a no-report condition, and second, to determine the extent to which SAN is modulated by task requirements and stimulation amplitude. Our results closely link P3b with task relevance and show that SAN is indeed modulated by task relevance but only when stimuli are delivered at the verge of detection. In other words, task relevance influences conscious perception through an enhancement of the associated neural responses but only for stimuli challenging to detect. Overall, our findings provide evidence that P3b is closely associated with task relevance, remaining out of the correlates of sensory awareness. In parallel, SAN modulations serve as a useful proxy for awareness in experimental manipulations involving attentional factors but only when stimuli are delivered near the sensory threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.