ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2025
Larger Fish Have Larger Brains With More Neurons Across but Not Within Cohorts Raised in Different Growth Conditions.
Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Larger Fish Have Larger Brains With More Neurons Across but Not Within Cohorts Raised in Different Growth Conditions.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparative work on brain size variation across vertebrates has shown that larger species have larger brains and that larger brains have more neurons across species in each clade. This trend supports the expectation that larger bodies require larger brains with more neurons but is at odds with the finding that within a species, larger animals do not necessarily have larger brains, and larger brains do not have more neurons. While the latter finding is inconsistent with the expectation that larger brained species evolve through selection of larger brained individuals, the lack of correlation between brain size and numbers of neurons across individuals of a same species might be due to the small range of variation that is typically found within a species. Here, we take advantage of ecologically regulated indeterminate growth exhibited by the cichlid fish tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) raised under different population densities to generate an over 30-fold variation in body mass across adult individuals of the same age. We find that across the cohorts of individuals raised with different growth opportunities provided by different population densities, larger animals have larger brains with more neurons that occur at similar neuronal densities, as applies to interspecific scaling in several vertebrate clades. Within each cohort raised at a given population density, however, those animals with more neurons have higher neuronal densities, but not larger brains or bodies, though the latter scale together-as applies to intraspecific scaling in mice and chickens. We conclude that brain size and number of neurons are determined independently across individuals in a population but scale together across cohorts, in step changes that accompany varying opportunities for growth, in the absence of any selection pressure. Based on these results, we propose a model of brain evolution through plastic changes in response to changing environmental opportunities that accounts for intra-, inter-, and clade-specific patterns of brain scaling and diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.