Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999648›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Respiration Facilitates Behavior During Multisensory Integration.

Martina Saltafossi, Andrea Zaccaro, Daniel S Kluger, Mauro Gianni Perrucci, Francesca Ferri, Marcello Costantini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martina SaltafossiInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-2466-4436
Andrea ZaccaroDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Daniel S KlugerInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Mauro Gianni PerrucciDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Francesca FerriDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Marcello CostantiniDepartment of Psychology, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

Boosting Ingenium for Excellence (BI4E) 101071321"Departments of Excellence 2023-2027" initiative of the Italian Ministry of University and ResearchDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KL 3580/1 - 1IMF KL 1 2 22 01PNRR Project "Boost for Interdisciplinarity"PRIN 2022 - Interoception and Active Aging (InterActing) Prot. 2022JS4SY2PRIN 2022 PNRR Project "Metaphor and epistemic injustice in mental illness: the case of schizophrenia" CUP D53D23020890001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain processes information from the external environment alongside signals generated by the body. Among bodily rhythms, respiration emerges as a key modulator of sensory processing. Multisensory integration, the non-linear combination of information from multiple senses to reduce environmental uncertainty, may be influenced by respiratory dynamics. This study investigated how respiration modulates reaction times and multisensory integration in a simple detection task. Forty healthy participants were presented with unimodal (Auditory, Visual, Tactile) and bimodal (Audio-Tactile, Audio-Visual, Visuo-Tactile) stimuli while their respiratory activity was recorded. Results revealed that reaction times systematically varied with respiration, with faster responses during peak inspiration and early expiration but slower responses during the expiration-to-inspiration transition. Applying the race model inequality approach to quantify multisensory integration, we found that Audio-Tactile and Audio-Visual stimuli exhibited the highest integration during the expiration-to-inspiration phase. These findings conceivably reflect respiration phase-locked changes in cortical excitability which in turn orchestrates multisensory integration. Interestingly, participants also tended to adapt their respiratory cycles, aligning response onsets preferentially with early expiration. This suggests that, rather than a mere bottom-up mechanism, respiration is actively adjusted to maximize the signal-to-noise balance between interoceptive and exteroceptive signals.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionInteroceptionRespirationTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adultbrain–body interactionsinteroceptionmultisensory integrationperceptionrespiration

Identifiers

PMID40999648
PMCPMC12464358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.