Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999628›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Electron and proton FLASH beam dosimetry using unified alanine, EBT-XD, and HD-V2 Gafchromic film dosimeters.

Seongmoon Jung, In Jung Kim, Chul-Young Yi, Yun Ho Kim, Young Min Seong, Rukundo Solomon, Sang Hyoun Choi, Young-Jae Jang, Se Byeong Lee, Chae-Eon Kim and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Seongmoon JungIonizing Radiation Metrology Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-158X
In Jung KimIonizing Radiation Metrology Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Young YiIonizing Radiation Metrology Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Yun Ho KimIonizing Radiation Metrology Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Young Min SeongIonizing Radiation Metrology Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Rukundo SolomonIonizing Radiation Metrology Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Sang Hyoun ChoiRadiation Therapy Technology and Standards, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Jae JangRadiation Therapy Technology and Standards, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Se Byeong LeeProton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Chae-Eon KimProton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Il PakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Jong In ParkIonizing Radiation Metrology Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science GP2025-0008-01National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) CAP22041-100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy, or FLASH RT, has shown potential to spare normal tissues while maintaining tumor control. However, accurate dosimetry at UHDR remains challenging, as conventional ionization chambers suffer from recombination effects. Although radiochromic films and alanine dosimeters have both been investigated independently for FLASH dosimetry, their separate use hinders robust validation and direct comparison of their measurements. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop and evaluate a unified dosimeter containing both alanine and radiochromic film for electron and proton FLASH beam dosimetry. The design allows for simultaneous, co-located irradiation of both dosimeter types, enabling a direct comparison between them. This configuration eliminates confounding factors such as positional offsets, alignment errors, and beam fluctuations, thereby facilitating the validation of measurements and enhancing confidence in FLASH dosimetry.

methodsThe unified alanine and EBT-XD/HD-V2 film dosimeter was designed with the same outer dimensions as the Advanced Markus chamber (PTW-Freiburg), allowing compatibility with commercial QA phantoms. Alanine and film dosimeters were calibrated under conventional electron and proton beams, traceable to absorbed dose to water from Co-60 gamma rays. The unified dosimeter was used to measure dose from a 9 MeV electron FLASH beam (Varian Clinac iX) and a 230 MeV proton FLASH beam (IBA machine), with alanine and film irradiated simultaneously at the same location.

resultsThe alanine dosimeter measured the dose per pulse, instantaneous dose rate, and mean dose rate at a source-to-surface distance of 100 cm for the electron FLASH beam as 0.99

conclusionsThe unified alanine and film dosimeters enabled simultaneous irradiation of the alanine and the films, with combined relative standard uncertainties of 2.4% (k = 1) for the alanine dosimeter and 3.5% (k = 1) for the EBT-XD films at the electron FLASH beam. For the proton FLASH beam, these uncertainties were 3.2% (k = 1) for both the alanine dosimeter and the EBT-XD films. Until dosimetry guidelines for the FLASH RT community are established by a working group such as AAPM TG-359, the dosimetry protocol proposed in this study can serve as a promising approach for FLASH RT facilities worldwide.

Indexed as

AlanineElectronsFilm DosimetryProtonsCalibrationAlanineProtonsalanine dosimeterEBT‐XD filmelectron FLASHHD‐V2 filmproton FLASHradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40999628
PMCPMC12464357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.