SynthesisBrain and behavior2025
Between Depression and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Between Depression and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Association between COVID-19 infection, elevated C-reactive protein, and neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Psychological Burden in Uncontrolled Hypertension: Findings from the ERIDANO Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Elevated Blood Pressure and Risk Factors in 19-Year-Olds in Serbia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- External factors show reproducible local symptom-biomarker associations in middle-aged and older adults with heart disease.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Overlooked Driver of Hypertension: Mental Stress at the Crossroad of Cardiology and Psychiatry.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension and depression are major global health concerns, with increasing evidence suggesting a potential bidirectional relationship between the two conditions. While previous studies have explored this association, the findings remain inconsistent, necessitating a comprehensive evaluation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between depression and the risk of developing hypertension by synthesizing evidence from observational studies.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to December 20, 2024. Observational studies that examined depression as an exposure and hypertension as an outcome were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore heterogeneity and assess the robustness of findings. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger test and funnel plots.
resultsA total of 36 studies were included, comprising cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control designs. The pooled analysis indicated a significant positive association between depression and hypertension (pooled OR = 1.198, 95% CI: 1.086-1.321), with substantial heterogeneity (I
conclusionThis study provides evidence supporting a positive association between depression and an increased risk of hypertension. The findings underscore the importance of integrating mental health screening in cardiovascular care and adopting multidisciplinary strategies to address both conditions. Further research is needed to clarify causal pathways and explore targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.