ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Cluster Analysis of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Identifying Characteristics of Long Hospital Stays in a Comprehensive Hospital.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Copeptin in acute ischemic stroke: a surrogate marker of AVP-system activation with temporal dynamics and clinical implications.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Article
- Cluster Analysis of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Identifying Characteristics of Long Hospital Stays in a Comprehensive Hospital.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, imposing a significant burden on patients and healthcare systems. Length of stay (LOS) is a critical metric for assessing hospital resource utilization and patient prognosis. Identifying characteristics of AIS patients with prolonged LOS is essential for optimizing resource allocation and improving patient management. This study aimed to use cluster analysis to profile AIS patients with long LOS in a comprehensive hospital and explore differences in characteristics across gender and age subgroups.
methodsThis single-center, retrospective cohort study included 664 patients admitted with AIS to Peking Union Medical College Hospital from June 2012 to September 2021. Data collected included demographics, admission NIHSS scores, stroke risk factors, etiologies, and diagnostic workups. Patients were clustered using the K-prototype method, a machine learning technique for subclassifying complex data, to differentiate between patients with long and short LOS. Statistical tests were used to identify significant differences between the clusters.
resultsCluster analysis revealed that patients with longer LOS had a higher proportion of females (42.9% vs. 24.7%, p < 0.001) and were generally younger (52.3 vs. 65.4 years, p < 0.001). This group exhibited lower proportions of TOAST type 1 strokes (17.7% vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001), higher levels of hsCRP and D-dimer, and no significant difference in acute phase NIHSS scores. Notably, in-hospital strokes and admissions to non-neurological departments were more frequent in the long LOS group. Subgroup analysis by gender and age revealed that younger males and females shared similar characteristics with the overall long LOS group, including a higher incidence of non-neurological department admissions and higher D-dimer levels.
conclusionsThis study highlights the heterogeneity of AIS and the importance of etiological identification, particularly in younger and female patients. Our findings suggest that traditional factors like NIHSS scores may not fully capture the complexity of factors influencing LOS in these groups. Improved cross-departmental collaboration is crucial for better management of AIS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.