Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999567›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2026

Synergistic Impact of Sleep Disturbance and Social Isolation in Adult but Not Adolescent Female Mice.

Christine Egebjerg, Birgitte Rahbek Kornum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christine EgebjergDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birgitte Rahbek KornumDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2515-9451

Funding

Lundbeck Foundation R344-2020-749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep quality and social isolation are two of the numerous environmental, social and health-related factors that contribute to major depressive disorder (MDD). In human studies, a strong association has been found between sleep quality and perceived loneliness, with each potentially exacerbating the other. In mouse studies, sleep deprivation is performed on either group-housed or individually housed mice, depending on the protocol, but the effect of social isolation is often not assessed. Here, we aimed to investigate the potential synergistic effects of sleep disturbances and social isolation in adolescent (Postnatal day 36) and young adult (9 weeks old) female mice. The mice were subjected to sleep disturbances for 7 days, consisting of 4 h of sleep restriction during the light phase, while group- or single-housed for 7 days. Both the individual and combined effects of sleep disturbance and social isolation were assessed. Our findings reveal significantly longer immobility in the tail suspension test in young adult mice after 7 days of sleep disturbance + social isolation compared to those in the sleep disturbance + socially housed group. The same effect was not seen with adolescent mice. This interaction between sleep disturbance and social isolation in the young adult group suggests a synergistic effect. In conclusion, single housing of mice can change the behavioural outcome of a sleep disturbance protocol. Further, adolescent mice appeared more resilient to the adverse behavioural effects of sleep disturbance in combination with social isolation than young adult mice.

Indexed as

Sleep Wake DisordersSocial IsolationAge FactorsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSleep Deprivationanxietydepressionhome‐cage behaviourneurodevelopmentsleep

Identifiers

PMID40999567
PMCPMC13193512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.