ReviewStem cell research & therapy2025
Three-dimensional midbrain organoids: a next-generation tool for Parkinson's disease modelling and drug discovery.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human iPSC-Derived Brain Organoids: A Disease-Oriented Evaluation of Modeling Fidelity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Rhobot-Screen: an integrated robotic platform for functional screening of rhodopsin variants.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Experimental Models and Translational Strategies in Neuroprotective Drug Development with Emphasis on Alzheimer's Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Brain organoids as precision models for neurodegenerative diseases: from disease modeling to drug discovery.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Interconnected roles of astrocytes and the blood-brain barrier in Parkinson's disease: pathological evidence, mechanistic insights, and knowledge gaps.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Differentiation of human iPSCs into dopaminergic neurons: comparative analysis of 2D and 3D protocols for disease modeling and pharmacology.Neuroscience applied · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Cas technologies in neurodegenerative disorders: mechanistic insights, therapeutic potential, and translational challenges.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by dopaminergic (DA) neuron loss and Lewy body formation, lacks therapies to halt neurodegeneration. Current models, including 2D cultures and animal studies, fail to fully recapitulate human midbrain complexity, underscoring the need for advanced human-relevant disease modelling systems. Midbrain organoids (MOs), three-dimensional (3D) stem cell-derived neuronal structures mimicking midbrain architecture, have emerged as transformative tools for modelling PD. These organoids replicate key pathological hallmarks and enable disease mechanistic studies and drug screening for PD. Recent advances of research in MOs include genetic modelling of PD-linked mutations (e.g., LRRK2, GBA1, DNAJC6), optogenetics-assisted α-synuclein (α-syn) protein aggregation systems, and high-throughput drug testing platforms. MOs also show promise for cell replacement therapy, with successful integration and functional recovery in animal PD models. However, challenges such as batch variability, limited vascularization, incomplete neuronal maturation, and high costs hinder reproducibility and scalability. Future directions focus on integrating vascular networks, microglia co-cultures, automated workflows, and assembloid technologies to enhance pathophysiological relevance and translational potential in PD. By addressing these limitations, research in MOs could revolutionize PD research, offering critical insights into disease mechanisms and accelerating therapeutic discovery for PD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.