ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of risky sexual behaviors among adolescents and young adults in West Africa.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a major public health concern, particularly among adolescents and young adults (AYA) in West Africa who reported higher prevalence of risky sexual behaviors. We therefore proposed a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of risky sexual behaviors for STIs among adolescents and young adults living in West Africa. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic searches of electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, African Index Medicus) will be conducted. Studies published between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2023, on the prevalence of sexual behaviors associated with STIs risk in AYA living in West Africa will be included. Two reviewers will independently conduct studies selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The selection of eligible studies will be based on titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review. The risk of bias assessment for eligible studies will be performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. If possible, a meta-analysis of data on the prevalence of each sexual risk behavior will be performed. The heterogeneity will be statistically assessed using a I DISCUSSION: This review will estimate the prevalence of risky sexual behaviors among AYA aged 15-24 years in West Africa to inform appropriate interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.