ArticleBMC psychology2025
Depression and anxiety symptom networks in hemorrhoid patients: evidence from the UK biobank.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of Discourse in the Reddit Hemorrhoid Community: Topic and Sentiment Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The bidirectional effects of hemorrhoids, depression, and anxiety: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHemorrhoidal disease is highly prevalent and associated with significant psychological distress. However, the interplay between depression and anxiety symptoms and their variation across subgroups remains uncharacterized. This study identifies the key symptoms contributing to distress in these patients and explores subgroup differences to optimize mental health interventions.
methodsWe analyzed data from 10,482 hemorrhoid patients in the UK Biobank and constructed Gaussian Graphical Models (GGMs) based on PHQ-9 and GAD-7 symptom scores. Network estimation was carried out using EBIC graphical lasso regularization, and centrality metrics including strength, betweenness, and closeness were calculated using the qgraph package. Subgroup comparisons by gender, smoking history, age, and time interval were performed using the NetworkComparisonTest with 1,000 bootstrap iterations.
resultsThe symptom network showed high stability (CS = 0.75), with "Sad mood" (strength = 1.41) and "Too much worry" (betweenness = 2.54) acting as central bridges between depressive and anxiety symptoms. Gender differences were pronounced: male and female networks differed significantly in both global strength (S = 0.19, p = 0.03) and structure (M = 0.10, p = 0.01), with women showing stronger emotion-cognition connections and men emphasizing somatic-behavioral linkages. Patients assessed ≥ 20 years after hemorrhoid diagnosis exhibited increased global connectivity (S = 0.23, p = 0.02) despite stable core architecture (M = 0.07, p = 0.73).
conclusions"Sad mood" and "Too much worry" are key treatment targets in hemorrhoid-related psychopathology. Gender-stratified approaches, such as emotion-focused therapies for women and behavioral activation for men, may help disrupt the pain-distress cycle. Applying principles of network psychiatry could optimize integrated care for this underserved population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.