Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999472›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2025

Combining dynamic generalized linear models and mechanistic modelling to optimize treatment strategies against bovine respiratory disease.

Carolina Merca, Baptiste Sorin-Dupont, Anders Ringgaard Kristensen, Sébastien Picault, Sébastien Assié, Pauline Ezanno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carolina Merca *Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 2, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. cmgm@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8598-9564
Baptiste Sorin-Dupont *Oniris, INRAE, BIOEPAR, 44300, Nantes, France. baptiste.sorin@outlook.com.
Anders Ringgaard KristensenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 2, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Sébastien PicaultOniris, INRAE, BIOEPAR, 44300, Nantes, France.
Sébastien AssiéOniris, INRAE, BIOEPAR, 44300, Nantes, France.
Pauline EzannoOniris, INRAE, BIOEPAR, 44300, Nantes, France.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (DECIDE) 101000494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a major health challenge for young bulls. To minimize economic losses, collective treatments have been widely adopted. Nevertheless, performing collective treatments involves a trade-off between BRD cumulative incidence and severity, and antimicrobial usage (AMU). Therefore, we propose a proof-of-concept of a decision support tool aimed at helping farmers and veterinarians make informed decisions about the appropriate timing for performing collective treatment for BRD. The proposed framework integrates a mechanistic stochastic simulation engine for modelling the spread of a BRD pathogen (Mannheimia haemolytica) and a hierarchical multivariate binomial dynamic generalized linear model (DGLM), which provides early warnings based on infection risk estimates. Using synthetic data, we studied 48 scenarios, involving two batch sizes (small and large), four farm risk levels for developing BRD (low, medium, balanced, and high), two batch allocation systems (sorted by risk level or randomly allocated), and three treatment interventions (individual, conventional collective, and DGLM-based collective). In high- and medium-risk scenarios, collective treatments triggered by the DGLM were associated with a reduction in BRD cumulative incidence and disease severity, especially in large populations. Compared with conventional treatments, DGLM-based collective treatments typically result in either lower or equivalent AMU, with the largest reductions being observed in medium-, balanced-, and high-risk scenarios. Additionally, the DGLM estimates of infection risk aligned well with the empirical risk estimates during the first time steps of the simulation. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed decision support tool in providing valuable guidance for improving animal welfare and AMU. Further validation through real-world data collected from on-farm situations is necessary.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBovine Respiratory Disease ComplexCattle DiseasesMannheimia haemolyticaAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCattleLinear ModelsMaleModels, BiologicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsDecision support toolearly warningsepidemiologylivestock healthstate‒space models

Identifiers

PMID40999472
PMCPMC12465693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.