ArticleBMC medical education2025
Use of simulation for teaching biomedical sciences to undergraduate medical students- a scoping review.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation- and AI-supported technical troubleshooting training for biomedical device technology students in intensive care equipment education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluating Medical Biochemistry Teaching and Learning Through Simulation: A Mixed-Methods, Quasi-Experimental Study in Medical Students in Ecuador.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this scoping review was to understand the methods, extent and type of evidence in relation to the use of simulation or SIM-based medical education pedagogies to teach biomedical sciences to undergraduate medical students in accredited medical schools, globally. The review considers literature published between 2014 and 2024. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The review only considered reports about populations of students enrolled in accredited undergraduate medical education programs that train medical doctors, including DO/MD/MBBS/MBChB or equivalents in any country. Simulation, as a concept, is considered as reportedly used in the context of teaching knowledge, skills, or practice-related attitudes in biomedical science disciplines. Articles published in the English Language were considered.
methodsAn initial search of the Cochrane and the Joanna Briggs Institute’s [JBI] Evidence-based Practice databases in October 2023 found no similar review. For this review, the primary databases searched included PubMed, ERIC, and Google Scholar. The JBI [Joanna Briggs Institute] SUMARI was the platform for screening, approval, extraction, synthesis, and review. For screening and appraisal, two members of the review team were required to approve an article.
resultsA total of 18 articles were considered for this review out of the initial yield of 2,671. These included: 4 Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies- 2 from Australia, 1 from the USA, and 1 from China; 2 Systematic Review and Research Syntheses; 3 Randomized Controlled Trials- 1 from China and 2 from Italy; 6 Quasi-Experimental Studies- 1 from Taiwan, 1 from the Netherlands, 1 from the both China and United Kingdom, 1 from Sweden, 1 from Indonesia and 1 from the United States; and 3 Text and Opinion Studies. Findings highlight the growing use of simulation and technology-enhanced learning in medical education, improving competency, retention, and engagement. Simulation, aided by VR, AR, and PBL, enhances motivation and skills but cannot fully replace hands-on training. Limitations include inconsistent assessment impacts, cost challenges, and accessibility concerns.
conclusionSimulation and technology-enhanced learning improve engagement, skills, and retention in medical education. Integration with traditional methods maximizes effectiveness. Virtual simulations aided by technologies, VR or AR offer immersive experiences but require careful implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.