ArticleBMC health services research2025
Challenges and solutions to effective stewardship of rehabilitation services: a scoping review.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speech in Line: A Catholic Ethical Approach in Prioritizing Children with Speech Delay or Elderly Stroke Survivors Amidst the Scarcity of Speech-Language Pathologists in the Philippines.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Overview of Rehabilitation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2026Article
- Strengthening rehabilitation to reduce burn contractures and disability in sub Saharan Africa.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimStrong and effective stewardship is a fundamental function of health systems. However, rehabilitation services often receive insufficient attention due to the limited priority assigned to them by governments and health systems. In many countries-particularly low- and middle-income nations-this neglect has resulted in fragmented and poorly coordinated rehabilitation services across various sectors, with inconsistent service delivery influenced by the internal policies of individual institutions. This study investigates the broader barriers to rehabilitation services, analyzes their implications for stewardship, and proposes solutions to improve governance and system coordination.
methodIn this scoping review of studies conducted in Iran and globally, we identified factors and strategies for effective stewardship of rehabilitation services using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Searches were performed in English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) and Persian databases (SID and Magiran), as well as the Google Scholar search engine, utilizing relevant English keywords and their Persian equivalents. Data were analyzed through a qualitative methodology employing directed content analysis. Additionally, Veillard et al.'s Health System Stewardship Framework was utilized to identify and analyze the challenges and solutions implemented in other countries.
findingsFrom a total of 38 published articles on rehabilitation services, six themes, eight sub-themes, 81 challenges, and 74 solutions were identified. The challenges included the ineffectiveness of the fragmented rehabilitation structure and stewardship, the absence of a comprehensive plan, and inadequate coordination and communication. Proposed solutions from these studies included establishing a central regulatory and governance body; developing rehabilitation services that recognize rehabilitation as a population-based strategy for health and well-being across a wide range of health conditions throughout the continuum of care and throughout life; and creating databases to track individuals with disabilities and the rehabilitation services provided to them.
conclusionEffective stewardship of integrated rehabilitation services necessitates service continuity, coordinated policymaking, and active stakeholder engagement. A cohesive governance structure, bolstered by a robust information system, is crucial for evidence-based decision-making. Aligning policies with operational plans fosters collaboration and improves service efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.