Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2025
Ultrasound-measured brachial artery reactive hyperemia in critically ill patients: an observational study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound-measured brachial artery reactive hyperemia (RH) is independently predictive of hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis. Its association with mortality is uncertain in critically ill patients in general.
methodsThis was a combined case-control and prospective cohort study. Ultrasound was used to measure brachial artery reactive hyperemia in 150 critically ill patients at a single academic medical center and in 44 control subjects without acute illness. Measurements were compared in cases versus controls, septic vs. non-septic critically ill patients, and hospital survivors vs. non-survivors. Follow-up measurements were obtained 3-5 days later in a sub-sample of patients.
resultsRH was calculated as the percent change in pre- vs. post-ischemic brachial artery velocity-time integral measured by Doppler ultrasound. RH was impaired in critically ill compared to control subjects (194 [179-210] vs. 369 [314-433]%, p < 0.001; results expressed as mean [95% confidence interval]) but similar in septic compared to non-septic patients (196 [177-217] vs. 199 [170-233], p = 0.88). RH was significantly lower in hospital non-survivors compared to survivors (144 [120-173] vs. 204 [187-222], p = 0.003). Multivariable analysis showed that the difference between survivors and non-survivors was not confounded by age or comorbidities (odds ratio for hospital death = 0.26 per log unit rise in RH, 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.83, p = 0.02). The magnitude of RH improved over 3-5 days in hospital survivors (n = 63, 204 [180-232] vs. 239 [208-275], p = 0.02), but did not change in non-survivors (n = 11, 133 [107-165] vs. 128 [75-220].
conclusionsReactive hyperemia of the brachial artery is impaired in undifferentiated critically ill patients, lower in non-survivors compared to survivors, and independently associated with hospital mortality. Brachial artery reactive hyperemia improves significantly over time in survivors but not in non-survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.