ArticleTrials2025
Engaging English- and Spanish-speaking older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in advance care planning group visits: protocol for the ENgaging in Advance Care Planning Talks (ENACT) randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05421728 (Effectiveness of Engaging in Advance Care Planning Talks), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Engaging in Advance Care Planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits in Primary Care for Older Adults With and Without Alzheimer's Disease
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) helps patients identify and communicate their preferences for medical care and prepares them for decision-making related to future care. While ACP is recommended for older adults with cognitive impairment, few interventions have been tested in primary care for this population. The ENACT trial tests the efficacy of the ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits intervention, which engages older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in group medical visits focused on the ACP process.
methodsThis two-arm randomized trial compares the efficacy of the ENACT Group Visits intervention arm to a control arm at 6-month follow-up. The trial will enroll at least 480 patients across 8 primary care clinics. Notable inclusion criteria include English or Spanish-speaking, age 70 or older, and no ACP documents in the electronic health record (EHR) in the past 2 years. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment screener will be administered at study enrollment to identify whether the participant has possible cognitive imparment. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the ENACT Group Visits arm or control arm. The ENACT Group Visits intervention entails two group visits, facilitated by multidisciplinary clinic staff. The control arm entails sending ACP materials via mail. The primary outcome is new documentation of ACP in the EHR at 6-month follow-up, and it will be analyzed using logistic regression with random effects for site. Secondary outcomes include patient-level ACP readiness, decision self-efficacy, and quality of communication. The impact of possible cognitive impairment on ENACT intervention efficacy will be examined. Survival analyses will be used to examine time-to-new ACP documentation. Mixed methods, including multiple qualitative methods, will be used to assess acceptability, feasibility, intervention fidelity, and other implementation outcomes of the ENACT intervention among patients with possible cognitive impairment. DISCUSSION: This study will determine the efficacy of the ENACT Group Visits intervention among diverse older adults, including those with possible cognitive impairment, as evidenced by increased documentation of ACP in the medical record. If efficacious, primary care clinics may implement this ACP intervention that leverages peer interactions and goal setting to support a person-centered ACP process.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT05421728. Registered on 13 June 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.