ReviewBMC surgery2025
The submission title: management of retroperitoneal perforated descending duodenal diverticulum using de pezzer catheter drainage combined with nutritional jejunostomy: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDuodenal diverticulum (DD) ranks as the second most prevalent form of intestinal diverticulum and is typically asymptomatic. However, perforations of DD, while rare, are associated with potentially fatal outcomes. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 78-year-old Chinese male patient presented with epigastric pain after overeating the day before admission. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen revealed cystic areas of extraluminal air in the posterior periduodenal area. We operated on the patient. A De Pezzer catheter and a nasogastric tube were placed in the duodenal cavity, supplemented by two external drainage tubes. Early postoperative enteral nutrition was facilitated through a jejunal feeding tube. The patient underwent successful surgical intervention and was discharged on the 12th post-operative day without any complications. DISCUSSION: Non-operative management may be suitable for carefully selected patients with stable vital signs and a timely diagnosis. Surgical intervention is necessary if conservative approaches fail or in cases leading to generalized peritonitis or severe sepsis. For posterior DD perforations, it is critical to focus not only on wound repair but also on ensuring adequate drainage and decompression of the periduodenal and intestinal cavities to reduce the risk of fistulas.
conclusionFor patients with perforations of DD, surgical intervention should be advocated, emphasizing on the prevention and treatment of duodenal fistula during the operation. The application of a De Pezzer catheter, nasogastric tube, and additional duodenal drainage, combined with jejunal feeding for nutritional support, adheres to damage control principles and leads to favorable clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.