Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2025
Use of a molecular syndromic panel for the etiological diagnosis of ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia: impact on clinical outcomes and antibiotic use from a multicenter, prospective study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Impact of the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A Difference-in-Differences Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
62 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVentilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) is a common infection in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU), with attributable mortality of up to 13%, and its etiological diagnosis remains challenging. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study within the MULTI-SITA platform to assess the impact on relevant clinical and antimicrobial stewardship outcomes of the use of a molecular syndromic panel (BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia plus), in addition to a standard approach based on culture. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality from VABP onset.
resultsOverall, 237 patients with VABP were included in the study. In multivariable analysis, SOFA score (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.22, p = 0.003), previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (HR 3.02, 95% CI 1.25–7.32, p = 0.015), and solid neoplasm (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.12–4.14, p = 0.022) were associated with increased mortality, while no association was registered for the molecular syndromic panel performed (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.59–1.93, p = 0.825). In secondary analyses, use of the molecular syndromic panel resulted in more events of either de-escalation or initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy at day 1 from VABP onset in comparison with a standard approach based on culture only (41.3% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.041).
conclusionThe use of a molecular syndromic panel in patients with VABP was able to impact antibiotic decisions, without an unfavorable effect on mortality. Further study is necessary to assess the long-term effects in terms of antimicrobial stewardship of molecular syndromic panels-based antibiotic treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.