ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Implementation context, mechanisms and outcomes of a transitional care intervention to prevent delirium: a mixed-methods process evaluation from the TRADE study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile predisposing factors for delirium, like old age or surgery, are well documented, less attention has been paid to environmental factors, including hospital transfer processes and caregiver involvement in transitional care of older patients. To address this gap, we developed a pathway to optimize hospital transfer processes and actively involve caregivers in preventing delirium. This complex intervention was tested in a pilot study using a stepped-wedge design across four hospitals, accompanied by a process evaluation to explore the implementation context, mechanisms and outcomes of this intervention.
methodsA parallel convergent mixed-methods process evaluation was used. Qualitative data and quantitative data were analyzed separately and integrated using a weaving approach. Analyses were guided by Normalization Process Theory, supplemented by implementation impact ratings based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research rating tool.
resultsData included 72 interviews, 2 focus groups, 82 document analyses, 14 status analyses, 424 TRADE questionnaires, 58 Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaires, and website traffic metrics. COVID-19-related constraints resulted in partial implementation of the intervention, with challenges such as limited training opportunities and restricted caregiver involvement. Healthcare professionals reported greater delirium awareness, and educational materials received positive feedback.
conclusionThe study underscores the critical role of discharge information, post-discharge support, and education for caregiver and healthcare professionals in preventing delirium. It also provides evidence of how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted standard care and the implementation of clinical interventions, emphasizing the need for adaptable processes and institutional support. Furthermore, it offers theoretical and methodological insights into conducting mixed-methods process evaluations in complex intervention research.
trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00017828, retrospectively registered on 17.09.2019, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017828 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.