Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999283›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2026

Mechanisms of socially facilitated feeding in Zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Britney Sekulovski, Liat Soref, Noam Miller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Long-term environmental unpredictability increases social information use in zebrafish.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Britney SekulovskiDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada. seku9360@mylaurier.ca.
Liat SorefDepartment of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Noam MillerDepartment of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social facilitation of feeding, where individuals increase their feeding behavior in the presence of conspecifics, is widely documented, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, particularly regarding passive versus active facilitation and the role of individual differences, such as sex and personality. We investigated how visual exposure to non-feeding conspecifics influenced feeding behavior in zebrafish (Danio rerio), examining food consumption and other feeding related behaviors, while also assessing individual variation in boldness and sociability. Zebrafish consumed significantly more food pellets and manipulated food differently when conspecifics were present, indicating that passive social facilitation due to the mere presence of conspecifics was sufficient to increase feeding behavior. Males exhibited stronger socially facilitated feeding responses, consuming more pellets, spitting pellets more frequently, and orienting food spitting away from stimulus fish, suggesting competitive motivations. Females showed more cautious feeding behavior, holding pellets in their mouths for longer. Contrary to predictions, neither boldness nor sociability predicted individual differences in feeding behavior or responses to social context. Our findings demonstrate that social facilitation due to a passive audience and sex-specific competitive strategies influence the feeding behaviors of zebrafish.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorSocial BehaviorSocial FacilitationZebrafishAnimalsFemaleIndividualityMaleFeeding behaviorSex differencesSocial facilitationZebrafish

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.