Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999281›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Comparison of qPCR methods for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis from granulomas collected at slaughterhouses.

Juliana Fernandes de Paula Castro, Gisele Oliveira de Souza, Sueli Akemi Taniwaki, Marcos Bryan Heinemann, José Soares Ferreira Neto

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliana Fernandes de Paula CastroFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87 - CEP, São Paulo, 05508-270, SP, Brasil.
Gisele Oliveira de SouzaFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87 - CEP, São Paulo, 05508-270, SP, Brasil.
Sueli Akemi TaniwakiFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87 - CEP, São Paulo, 05508-270, SP, Brasil.
Marcos Bryan HeinemannFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87 - CEP, São Paulo, 05508-270, SP, Brasil.
José Soares Ferreira NetoFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87 - CEP, São Paulo, 05508-270, SP, Brasil. jsoares@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-6245

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/13556-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the direct diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in lesions from carcasses condemned at slaughterhouses - the primary method for identifying infected farms within the Surveillance System - two qPCR assays were evaluated against the gold standard: culture and identification of Mycobacterium bovis. A total of 167 lesion samples were collected by inspection services in Mato Grosso and Santa Catarina. Samples were homogenized and analyzed using culture and qPCR targeting the IS1081 sequence (for the M. tuberculosis complex) and the RD4 region (specific to M. bovis). Both qPCR assays demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and specificity, confirming the diagnostic value of these targets. The IS1081 qPCR showed a sensitivity of 0.80 [95% CI: 0.69-0.89] and specificity of 0.79 [95% CI: 0.70-0.87]. The RD4 qPCR yielded a sensitivity of 0.74 [95% CI: 0.61-0.84] and specificity of 0.84 [95% CI: 0.76-0.91]. Agreement between the two qPCR assays was high (K = 0.89 [95% CI: 0.82-0.96]). When using the parallel results of culture and IS1081 qPCR as gold standard, the RD4 assay achieved a sensitivity of 0.74 [95% CI: 0.64-0.83] and specificity of 1.00 [95% CI: 0.96-1.00]. In conclusion, both assays produced comparable results. The RD4 qPCR, due to its specificity for M. bovis, shows promise as a replacement for classical bacteriology and conventional PCR in bTB surveillance, offering operational advantages.

Indexed as

GranulomaMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium bovisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTuberculosis, BovineAbattoirsAnimalsBrazilCattleSensitivity and SpecificityBovine tuberculosisbTB surveillance systemDirect diagnosisqPCR

Identifiers

PMID40999281
PMCPMC12660589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.