ReviewJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2025
A Systematic Review on the Effective Teaching Strategies and Methods for Cancer Patient Education.
Review in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Practice Guideline on Effective Teaching Strategies and Methods for Cancer Patient Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Review
- Enhancing Community Pharmacists' Professional Competencies and Sun-Safe Behaviors Through the FarmaSoludable Educational Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient education is crucial for supporting individuals Living with or at risk of cancer. It empowers them with the knowledge necessary to navigate their diagnosis and treatment plan, improve health and digital health Literacy, and facilitate meaningful care engagement. There is a lack of current evidence on the most effective teaching strategies and methods for supporting individuals living with or at risk of developing cancer. As such, this systematic review aims to explore effective cancer patient education strategies and methods in terms of knowledge, physical and psychological well-being, satisfaction, experience, and self-efficacy. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Prospero, and Epistemonikos.org for Guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published between January 2018 and June 2024, capturing the key concepts of teaching strategies or delivery methods for cancer patient education. Of the 3762 articles screened, 27 met the inclusion criteria. Study findings showed that one-on-one and group teaching strategies are effective in terms of improving psychological well-being, reducing anxiety, and enhancing cancer-related knowledge. The combination of these strategies in a multi-modality teaching strategy is effective in addressing diverse needs of learners and enhancing outcomes. Teaching materials and methods, including tailored written materials, verbal discussion, audio-visual materials, and technology-based tools (e.g., eLearning platforms), are effective strategies in different contexts, with certain aspects that should be carefully considered. By considering these various teaching strategies and the context in which they are most effective, learners can be better empowered to make informed decisions regarding their health and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40999279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.