Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999264›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

A Novel Intervention for Medicaid Beneficiaries with Complex Needs.

Luke Mueller, Neil Batlivala, Jonathan Palisoc, Connie Kim, Andrey Ostrovsky, Michael Ong, Nathan Favini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luke MuellerPair Team, San Francisco, CA, USA. luke@pairteam.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4326-8168
Neil BatlivalaPair Team, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jonathan PalisocDepartment of Health Management & Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Connie KimPair Team, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrey OstrovskySocial Innovation Ventures, Lewes, DE, USA.
Michael OngDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nathan FaviniPair Team, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCase management interventions may improve outcomes for patients with complex medical and social needs, though previous research has shown mixed results. Enhanced Care Management (ECM), a central element of the California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal (CalAIM) initiative, aims to deliver an intensive case management solution for high-needs Medi-Cal (California's Medicaid program) members.

objectiveTo evaluate a novel intervention that combines ECM, telemedicine, and integrated social care delivery from community-based organizations.

designRetrospective cohort study.

participantsAdult, ECM-eligible Medi-Cal members.

interventionEnrollment with Pair Team, a California-based medical group and ECM provider that combines ECM, telemedicine, and integrated social care delivery from community-based organizations. MAIN MEASURES: Engagement with program and healthcare, program implementation metrics, and mental health outcomes. Pre-post analyses compared data from the year post enrollment versus year prior. KEY

resultsThe study included 568 patients (395 [69.5%] female; average age 42.8 years). Patients averaged 3.3 program interactions per month over one year of enrollment; 17.8% of interactions were with an RN or NP. Patients engaged with Pair Team within 30 days of discharge from an ED or inpatient visit in 94.3% of visits. Post-enrollment, 300 (52.7%) patients had an HbA1c lab record (127 [22.3%] pre-enrollment, p < 0.001) and 465 (81.7%) had a blood pressure reading (423 [74.3%] pre-enrollment, p = 0.003). Post-enrollment, there was a 21% increase in outpatient visits (RR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29), a 52% reduction in ED visits (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.42-0.55) and a 26% reduction in inpatient visits (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99). PHQ-9 decreased by 4.0 points (p < 0.001) between intake and follow-up.

conclusionsStudy participants receiving ECM services were highly engaged with the program and in their healthcare, and experienced reductions in acute care utilization and depressive symptoms. This highlights the Pair model's potential in improving care for patients with complex needs.

Indexed as

Case ManagementMedicaidAdultCaliforniaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTelemedicineUnited Statescare managementcase managementECMhigh-need, high-costMedicaidPair Team

Identifiers

PMID40999264
PMCPMC13083700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.