ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Making sense of recurrent boom and bust cycles in Canadian public health systems.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Public health systems undergo recurrent "boom and bust" cycles, also described as panic and neglect. Given such turbulence, we argue that Canadian public health workers, institutions, and systems would benefit from more spaces for sensemaking and policy capacity. This commentary shares observations on these public health cycles. It builds on specific concepts and frameworks from the disciplines of organizational development, health policy, public health sociology, political science, and public administration. It contends that holding organizational spaces for sensemaking is possible and useful for at least five reasons: (1) it may help public health workers contend with the complex dynamics underlying their daily work, (2) fortifying policy capacity (particularly analytical competences) can be a stepping stone in the process of becoming better learning organizations, (3) discerning common patterns or helpful strategies to better cope with change likely paves the way for more efficient and better-adapted solutions, (4) creating spaces for sensemaking may lead to innovations in public health decision-making, such as more meaningful citizen participation and greater staff involvement, (5) securing sensemaking spaces while maintaining day-to-day operations is feasible, even in the midst of major reforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.