Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999257›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026

Making sense of recurrent boom and bust cycles in Canadian public health systems.

Ak'ingabe Guyon, Mathieu Masse Jolicoeur, Jasmine Pawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ak'ingabe GuyonÉcole de Santé Publique de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. akingabe.guyon@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8764-4011
Mathieu Masse JolicoeurÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jasmine PawaDivision of Clinical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7264-5364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health systems undergo recurrent "boom and bust" cycles, also described as panic and neglect. Given such turbulence, we argue that Canadian public health workers, institutions, and systems would benefit from more spaces for sensemaking and policy capacity. This commentary shares observations on these public health cycles. It builds on specific concepts and frameworks from the disciplines of organizational development, health policy, public health sociology, political science, and public administration. It contends that holding organizational spaces for sensemaking is possible and useful for at least five reasons: (1) it may help public health workers contend with the complex dynamics underlying their daily work, (2) fortifying policy capacity (particularly analytical competences) can be a stepping stone in the process of becoming better learning organizations, (3) discerning common patterns or helpful strategies to better cope with change likely paves the way for more efficient and better-adapted solutions, (4) creating spaces for sensemaking may lead to innovations in public health decision-making, such as more meaningful citizen participation and greater staff involvement, (5) securing sensemaking spaces while maintaining day-to-day operations is feasible, even in the midst of major reforms.

Indexed as

Public Health AdministrationCanadaHealth PolicyHumansPublic Health InfrastructureCanadaHealth policyOrganizational efficiencyPublic healthPublic health administrationPublic health practice

Identifiers

PMID40999257
PMCPMC13345659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.