ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
A scoping review of barriers experienced by underserved and rural maternal populations in accessing epidural analgesia in the United States.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to epidural analgesia remains limited, particularly for high-risk underserved US women. Our scoping review aims to identify barriers experienced by US underserved and rural pregnant women in gaining access to epidurals and to review the scope of current interventions that exist to address these concerns. The Arksey and O'Malley York methodology was used as guidance for this review and consists of five steps: (1) identifying research questions; (2) searching for relevant studies; (3) selecting studies relevant to the research questions; (4) charting the data; and (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting results. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations were also used for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in this scoping review. 10 studies were retained for analysis. Of the various SDOH identified, those related to social and community context had the highest rates, and among the SDOH, race was the most prevalent. Barriers encountered by US underserved and rural maternal populations in accessing epidural analgesia fell at the individual level (n = 27), followed by organizational (n = 25), interpersonal (n = 18), social/political (n = 17), and community levels (n = 10). Major themes in future directions were identified through qualitative thematic analysis to address gaps in access and utilization of epidural analgesia in underserved US women. SDOH and systemic barriers play a role in hindering access to and utilization of epidural analgesia. Efforts to improve access to epidural analgesia through multifaceted, culturally responsive, and systemic interventions are required to address informational gaps and structural challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40999214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.