Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40999205›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2026

Feedback with feelings: the human complexity of expressing judgements about performance.

Margaret Bearman, Joanne Hilder, Damian Castanelli, Elizabeth Molloy, Chris Watling, Robyn Woodward-Kron, Rola Ajjawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margaret BearmanDeakin University, Melbourne, Australia. margaret.bearman@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6862-9871
Joanne HilderSouthern Cross University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6809-6190
Damian CastanelliMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5377-809X
Elizabeth MolloyUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9457-9348
Chris WatlingRoyal College of Surgeons and Physicians of Canada/ Western University, London, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9686-795X
Robyn Woodward-KronUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3973-818X
Rola AjjawiUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0651-3870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedback is an emotional business; evoking optimism, fear or disappointment, which in turn can lead to engagement, further feedback seeking or avoidance. Emotions therefore are not just background noise but are fundamental to the experience. Through conceptualising emotions as embodied, social and complex, we seek to better understand how feelings work within feedback in clinical education, beyond an individual 'managing' their emotions. In this post-qualitative study, we ask: How does the interplay between feelings and feedback unfold in specialty medical training? To this end, we conducted a focussed ethnography of feedback in intensive care medicine and surgical training in Australian tertiary-care hospitals. Thinking with theory, we traced how trainees' feelings move within and between feedback encounters through observation-based field notes and interview transcripts. We provide thick description of how feedback is saturated with feeling, integrating our findings with discussion. Supervisors expressed their judgements about trainee performance as feelings, through feelings and about feelings. And trainees responded with feelings of their own. Formal feedback particularly intensified feelings, which 'stuck with' trainees, leading to action, including avoidance. Feelings served to strengthen relationships and reinforce social hierarchies both within and beyond the supervisor-trainee dyad. We infer that the judgements made in and around feedback - such as appraisal of source credibility, assessment of performance quality, and deciding future actions - are themselves fundamentally entangled with feelings. A first step to remedy the desire to 'manage' emotions through 'putting them away' is to acknowledge their presence in clinical learning environments.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEmotionsFeedbackFormative FeedbackJudgmentAnthropology, CulturalAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchEmotionsFeedbackPostgraduate trainingPost-qualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40999205
PMCPMC13233895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.