ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
High-level production of Tauroursodeoxycholic acid from Taurochenodeoxycholic acid in engineered Bacillus subtilis via whole-cell biotransformation.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bear bile powder, a valuable traditional Chinese medicinal material, is distinguished by its high content of tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), typically present at a ratio of 0.82 to 1.76 relative to taurochenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA). In this study, the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) bacterium Bacillus subtilis was engineered to create a two-step enzymatic pathway for TCDCA to TUDCA bioconversion, utilizing bidirectional redox enzymes 7α/7β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Ribosome binding site (RBS) optimization and glucose 1-dehydrogenase (GDH)-mediated NAD(P)H cofactor regeneration were implemented to increase TUDCA production. The engineered strains A2-2 and A2-2-5 produced 15.10 ± 0.36 g/L and 14.33 ± 1.24 g/L of TUDCA, with TUDCA/TCDCA ratios of 1.22 and 0.88, respectively, following 15 h of fermentation in a whole-cell biocatalytic system. T-7-KLCA intermediate was undetectable. This study provided a cost-effective and scalable approach for the industrial production of potential bear bile substitutes from readily available chicken bile powder using an engineered probiotic B. subtilis microbial cell factory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40999182What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.