ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025
The intricate relationship between capillary refill time and systemic hemodynamics in septic shock.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological limits of capillary refill time: a human endotoxemia study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Pathophysiology of distributive shock in sepsis: beyond vasoplegia.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Twenty-five years of septic shock hemodynamic resuscitation trials: a conceptual perspective.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Comparison of norepinephrine with a combined non-catecholaminergic therapy in a porcine model of refractory cardiac arrest resuscitated with VA-ECMO.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Acute hemodynamic tests to determine the status of macro-to-microcirculatory coupling during septic shock resuscitation.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Impaired tissue perfusion in high-risk patients having major abdominal surgery: a multicenter observational study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Passive leg raising and microvascular skin blood flow to predict peripheral tissue perfusion fluid responsiveness.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Pushing the needle beyond preload: toward dynamic evaluation of venous congestion.Critical care science · 2026Article
- Capillary refill time changes are associated with Vascular Waterfall response in post-cardiac surgery patients.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence and validation of capillary refill time (CRT) as a resuscitation target together with its rapid kinetics of response to increases in systemic blood flow makes it the ideal variable to assess clinical reperfusion and the status of macro-to-microcirculatory coupling in septic shock. Moreover, previous studies have shown that resuscitation can be safely stopped after CRT normalization, thus decreasing the risk of over-resuscitation. From a physiological point of view, CRT is a complex variable integrating microvascular flow and reactivity. Additionally, it may be understood as a dynamic test that evaluates the preservation or disruption of normal responses of the microcirculation to maintain blood flow after transient ischemic challenges. The relationship between systemic hemodynamics and CRT is complex. Indeed, single time-point asssessments of CRT are not able to predict absolute cardiac output values and this is logical since they belong to different phsyiological categories. An abnormal CRT may be explained by insufficient macrohemodynamic resuscitation but also by several derangements at the microvascular level that may preclude CRT normalization, thus signaling a state of macro-to-microcirculatory uncoupling. CRT response to an acute fluid or mean arterial pressure challenge, may not only reveal the adequacy of systemic blood flow but also contribute to tailor interventions to personalize septic shock resuscitation. The lack of CRT response to these challenges discloses a more complex pathophysiological condition that is associated with higher mortality. Further research efforts should be focused on better understanding the factors associated with CRT non-response as a first step to develop a more phsyiologically-based resuscitation, that could eventually improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.