ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Intraoperative complications and prevention strategies in robot-assisted breast surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery: implications for modern anesthetic practice.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Cutting-edge trends in da Vinci single-port robotic approaches to breast surgery: a narrative review.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted breast surgery (RAS) improves cosmetic outcomes, but poses anatomical challenges-such as limited working space and lack of tactile feedback-that may increase intraoperative complication risk. To investigate the types and frequencies of intraoperative complications in RAS and assess preventive strategies employed by robotic breast surgeons based on their clinical experience, this Web-based survey was distributed to members of the Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery Study Group. Twenty-six breast surgeons actively performing RAS responded to the questionnaire. The ten-item questionnaire was used to obtain data on surgeon demographics, RAS experience, intraoperative complications, and preventive strategies. The primary outcome was the prevalence of intraoperative complications; secondary outcomes included associations with surgeon experience and preventive strategies used. Among the 26 respondents, 80.8% (n = 21) reported at least one intraoperative complication during RAS. Patient-related complications included skin injury, brachial plexus palsy, incomplete breast tissue resection, and iatrogenic pneumothorax. Technical issues included CO₂ leakage and mechanical failure. All surgeons with > 50 cumulative RAS cases reported complications, whereas those with ≤ 20 cases reported none. This is the first study to systematically document intraoperative complications and preventive strategies in RAS in Korea. These findings offer valuable insights into complication patterns and practical prevention strategies that may inform surgical training, standardize practice, and improve patient safety in RAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40999108What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.